Most retirees arrive at their sixties with retirement savings spread across three distinct tax buckets. There are taxable accounts, where you have already paid tax on the principal and owe tax only on gains and dividends. There are tax-deferred accounts like traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, where every dollar you withdraw is treated as ordinary income. And there are tax-free accounts, primarily Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s, where qualified withdrawals create no tax liability at all. The question is not whether you have enough saved. It is whether you are drawing it in the right order.
The three-bucket framework
Understanding where your money lives is the foundation of tax-aware retirement planning. Each bucket has its own rules, its own timing constraints, and its own tax implications.
Taxable accounts include brokerage accounts, individual stocks, and mutual funds held outside of retirement plans. You pay tax on interest, dividends, and realized capital gains. Long-term capital gains rates are typically 0%, 15%, or 20%, depending on your total income. These 3.8% net investment income tax may apply at higher income levels. These accounts have no required distributions and no early withdrawal penalties, which makes them the most flexible bucket.
Tax-deferred accounts include traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and similar workplace plans. Contributions were made with pre-tax dollars, so every distribution is taxed as ordinary income at your current marginal rate. These accounts are subject to required minimum distributions beginning at age 73 (for those who reach that age after 2022 under current law). Withdrawals before age 59 and a half usually trigger a 10% penalty on top of ordinary income tax, with limited exceptions.
Tax-free accounts are primarily Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s. Contributions were made with after-tax dollars, so qualified withdrawals of both principal and growth are free of federal income tax. Roth IRAs have no RMDs during the original owner's lifetime, which makes them powerful tools for tax flexibility and estate planning. Roth 401(k)s are subject to RMDs unless rolled to a Roth IRA.
The conventional sequence and why it is only a starting point
The standard advice is to spend down taxable accounts first, then tax-deferred, then Roth last. The logic is straightforward: let your tax-sheltered accounts continue growing for as long as possible. For many retirees, this approach works well. But it is a starting point, not a universal rule. A rigid sequence can leave money on the table, or worse, accelerate you into a higher tax bracket later in retirement when RMDs kick in and Social Security becomes fully taxable.
The optimal withdrawal sequence depends on your age, your account balances, your other income sources, and the tax environment in the years ahead. What makes sense at 62 may be entirely wrong at 72. The most effective strategy is one that is reviewed annually, not set in stone at retirement.
Tax bracket management: the central lever
The goal of a tax-aware withdrawal strategy is to control your marginal tax rate over the full length of your retirement, not merely to minimize tax in any single year. Taking too little from tax-deferred accounts early can create a tax bomb later, when RMDs force large distributions at a time when you may have fewer deductions and fewer opportunities to absorb the income efficiently.
Consider a retiree who stops working at 62 but delays Social Security until 70. Those eight years create a valuable window. With no wage income and Social Security not yet started, this retiree may have an unusually low taxable income. Filling those lower brackets with withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts, or with Roth conversions, can reduce the balance subject to future RMDs and lock in today's tax rates.
The math is compelling. A married couple filing jointly in 2025 can remain in the 12% federal bracket on taxable income up to approximately $94,300. Once RMDs and Social Security begin, that same couple could find themselves pushed into the 22% or 24% bracket with little ability to avoid it. Paying 12% now to avoid 24% later is a trade worth examining.
Social Security and the tax torpedo
Social Security benefits are taxed based on your combined income, which is defined as your adjusted gross income plus nontaxable interest plus half of your Social Security benefits. Depending on that total, either 0%, 50%, or 85% of your benefits may be subject to federal income tax.
The concern is that additional withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts can trigger a sharp increase in the taxable portion of your Social Security, an effect sometimes called the tax torpedo. A dollar withdrawn from a traditional IRA may not only be taxed as ordinary income; it may also cause an additional 85 cents of Social Security to become taxable. That creates an effective marginal rate far higher than your bracket suggests.
Managing this interaction is one of the most nuanced parts of retirement income planning. Drawing from Roth accounts in years when you want to avoid increasing your combined income can help preserve the favorable tax treatment of your benefits. Coordinating the start date of Social Security with your withdrawal strategy is equally important. Delaying benefits while drawing down tax-deferred accounts can smooth your lifetime tax curve.
Medicare premiums and the IRMAA cliff
Medicare Part B and Part D premiums are means-tested. If your modified adjusted gross income exceeds certain thresholds, you pay Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts, or IRMAA surcharges. These are not gradual. They operate in brackets, and crossing a threshold by even one dollar can trigger a premium increase that applies for the full year.
In 2025, for example, a married couple filing jointly with MAGI above $206,000 pays higher Part B premiums than a couple at $205,000. The gap between brackets is relatively narrow, and a large Roth conversion or a significant tax-deferred withdrawal can push you across unintentionally. The premium increase is effectively a hidden tax, one that is easy to overlook when planning withdrawals.
This is why withdrawal sequencing should be modeled, not estimated. A conversion that looks appealing in isolation may become expensive once Medicare surcharges are factored in. Tax-aware planning means seeing the full picture, not just the line on your 1040.
Required minimum distributions: the forced income
Once you reach age 73, the IRS requires you to begin taking distributions from traditional IRAs and most employer-sponsored plans. The percentage starts around 3.65% and increases with age. For retirees with substantial tax-deferred balances, RMDs can become the dominant income source, overwhelming other planning choices.
The best defense against oversized RMDs is to reduce your tax-deferred balance before they begin. That often means withdrawing from traditional accounts earlier than conventional advice suggests, or executing Roth conversions during low-income years. The objective is to move money out of the tax-deferred bucket on your own terms, at lower rates, rather than letting the government dictate the timing later at potentially higher rates.
This is particularly relevant for widows and widowers. When one spouse passes away, the survivor files as a single taxpayer. The income thresholds for brackets and IRMAA are roughly half what they were for the couple. A withdrawal strategy that kept a married couple comfortably in the 12% bracket may push a surviving spouse into the 22% or 24% bracket with the same dollar amount. Planning for that transition is an essential part of a durable-data-aware retirement plan.
Roth conversions: when they help and when they do not
Converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA means paying tax now in exchange for tax-free growth and withdrawals later. There is no limit on how much you can convert in a given year, which makes conversions a powerful tool for shifting income between tax years.
Conversions are most valuable in what planners call the gap years: after wage income ends but before Social Security and RMDs begin. They are also valuable after a market decline, when account values are lower and the same conversion costs less in tax. And they can be useful when you expect to be in a higher bracket in the future, whether because of RMDs, because one spouse will eventually file alone, or because you believe tax rates will rise.
Conversions are less valuable when you would need to pay the conversion tax from the IRA itself, which reduces the amount that continues growing. They are also costly if a large conversion pushes you into a higher bracket or triggers IRMAA surcharges. Paying the tax from a taxable account preserves more assets inside the Roth and often makes the math work.
The estate-planning angle
Tax-aware withdrawal strategy is not only about your lifetime. It is also about what you leave behind. Roth accounts pass to heirs income-tax-free, which makes them among the most tax-efficient assets to inherit. Traditional IRAs pass with their tax liability attached, and under current law most non-spouse beneficiaries must empty inherited accounts within ten years. That compressed timeline can force heirs into higher brackets than they would otherwise face.
If leaving a tax-efficient inheritance is a priority, preserving Roth assets while spending down traditional accounts can make sense even when the lifetime tax math is neutral. The intergenerational tax savings can be substantial, particularly for heirs who are in their peak earning years when they inherit.
A framework, not a formula
There is no single correct withdrawal sequence for every retiree. The right approach depends on your balances, your income sources, your health, your charitable goals, your state of residence, and your views on future tax policy. What works for your neighbor may be entirely wrong for you.
What is universal is the value of thinking about withdrawals as a multi-year tax problem rather than a series of isolated annual decisions. Each year's withdrawals affect the next year's brackets, the next year's Medicare premiums, and the next year's Social Security taxation. Small adjustments in your sixties can produce large savings in your eighties.
The retirees who fare best are the ones who treat tax planning as an ongoing discipline, not a one-time calculation at retirement. They review their strategy annually with a tax professional and a financial planner working in coordination. They model scenarios before making large conversions or withdrawals. And they remain flexible, adjusting as tax law changes, as markets move, and as their own circumstances evolve.
If you would like a second set of eyes on your retirement income strategy, let's connect.